Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

UEFA defends football schedule amidst growing criticism

0

By: Nana Kwame Bediako 

A chorus of discontent has emerged from numerous European football clubs, all voicing concerns over the congested fixture schedules that they argue are leading to an increase in player injuries.

As clubs grapple with mounting injury crises, the call for a reduction in the number of games has become a resounding demand. The conversation has reached a fever pitch, with many stakeholders in the football community urging governing bodies to reconsider the current scheduling practices to protect the health and well-being of players.

Amidst this backdrop, UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin has stepped into the fray, offering a robust defence of the existing football calendar.

Čeferin’s comments highlight the financial implications of reducing the number of matches. “It’s easy always to attack FIFA and UEFA,” he stated, pointing out the economic reality that fewer games would lead to less revenue.

Čeferin’s remarks also drew a stark comparison between the earnings of professional footballers and those of everyday workers. “Who should complain are the factory workers who get €1,000 per month,” he remarked, suggesting that the financial rewards enjoyed by players should be considered when discussing the demands of the sport. This comparison has sparked further debate about the nature of professional football and the expectations placed on its athletes.

The issue of fixture congestion is not a new one, but it has gained renewed attention in light of the ongoing challenges faced by clubs. Many argue that the relentless pace of matches, exacerbated by international tournaments and domestic leagues, leaves little room for recovery and increases the risk of injuries. As clubs continue to voice their concerns, the pressure mounts on governing bodies to find a solution that addresses both the financial and physical demands of the modern game.

In the midst of this debate, the football community remains divided. While some support Čeferin’s stance, others call for a more player-centric approach to scheduling.

More stories here

Related

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.