UEFA defends football schedule amidst growing criticism
By: Nana Kwame Bediako
A chorus of discontent has emerged from numerous European football clubs, all voicing concerns over the congested fixture schedules that they argue are leading to an increase in player injuries.
As clubs grapple with mounting injury crises, the call for a reduction in the number of games has become a resounding demand. The conversation has reached a fever pitch, with many stakeholders in the football community urging governing bodies to reconsider the current scheduling practices to protect the health and well-being of players.
Amidst this backdrop, UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin has stepped into the fray, offering a robust defence of the existing football calendar.
Čeferin’s comments highlight the financial implications of reducing the number of matches. “It’s easy always to attack FIFA and UEFA,” he stated, pointing out the economic reality that fewer games would lead to less revenue.
Čeferin’s remarks also drew a stark comparison between the earnings of professional footballers and those of everyday workers. “Who should complain are the factory workers who get €1,000 per month,” he remarked, suggesting that the financial rewards enjoyed by players should be considered when discussing the demands of the sport. This comparison has sparked further debate about the nature of professional football and the expectations placed on its athletes.
The issue of fixture congestion is not a new one, but it has gained renewed attention in light of the ongoing challenges faced by clubs. Many argue that the relentless pace of matches, exacerbated by international tournaments and domestic leagues, leaves little room for recovery and increases the risk of injuries. As clubs continue to voice their concerns, the pressure mounts on governing bodies to find a solution that addresses both the financial and physical demands of the modern game.
In the midst of this debate, the football community remains divided. While some support Čeferin’s stance, others call for a more player-centric approach to scheduling.
More stories here
